- Advertisement -

Litigation Finance Emerges as an Uncorrelated Corner of Private Markets

Private markets have expanded far beyond traditional private equity, private credit, and infrastructure investing. Among the more specialized corners of the alternatives universe sits litigation finance, an asset class where investors provide capital to fund legal disputes in exchange for a share of potential settlements or damages. Seeking to capitalize on this niche segment, French independent asset management firm IVO Capital Partners has established since 2014 a dedicated litigation finance strategy focused on providing third-party funding across legal disputes. While still relatively unknown among many institutional investors, litigation finance offers exposure to a distinct return stream driven by legal outcomes rather than traditional market forces.

Understanding Litigation Finance

The principle behind litigation finance is relatively straightforward: investors finance the costs associated with pursuing a claim, while returns depend on the successful outcome of the litigation. “As a fund, we take charge of all the costs of litigation: lawyers, experts, and everything related to the dispute,” explains Alexandre Lercher, Litigation Finance Fund Manager at IVO Capital Partners. “If the claim succeeds, then we receive a part of the damages recovered by the claimant. But if the dispute is lost, then we lose our investment.” Because litigation finance investments are generally structured on a non-recourse basis, downside is limited to invested capital, while successful cases can generate significant upside.

“As a fund, we take charge of all the costs of litigation: lawyers, experts, and everything related to the dispute. If the claim succeeds, then we receive a part of the damages recovered by the claimant. But if the dispute is lost, then we lose our investment.”

Alexandre Lercher, Litigation Finance Fund Manager at IVO Capital Partners.

Although legal expenses can generally be estimated with reasonable confidence, returns are ultimately determined by the success and scale of legal claims. “Our economic return is driven by an option embedded in the funding agreement,” explains Lercher. “The economics are agreed from day one. Our return is typically defined as either a multiple of the capital invested or a share of the proceeds recovered, with the funding agreement specifying how the final amount is calculated following a successful outcome.” IVO Capital targets gross returns of roughly three to four times invested capital on successful cases. 

“The economics are agreed from day one. Our return is typically defined as either a multiple of the capital invested or a share of the proceeds recovered, with the funding agreement specifying how the final amount is calculated following a successful outcome.”

Alexandre Lercher, Litigation Finance Fund Manager at IVO Capital Partners.

This creates a risk-return profile that, in some respects, resembles venture capital or private equity, where a limited number of large winners compensate for unsuccessful investments. “You can have unicorn outcomes,” argues Lercher. “A case costing €2 million could generate €20 million, €30 million, or potentially much more because the amount invested does not directly determine the size of the damages.”

For institutional investors, the appeal extends beyond return potential. Litigation finance offers exposure to risk factors largely disconnected from traditional financial markets, with outcomes primarily driven by legal processes rather than economic growth, interest rates, or market sentiment. “This is probably one of the least correlated asset classes available today,” says Lercher. “The value driver is the amount of damages claimed in the dispute and that amount is not directly influenced by markets or spreads.”

Building a Pan-European Litigation Platform

IVO Capital Partners launched its fourth litigation finance vintage during 2025 and predominantly focuses on continental Europe, covering nearly ten jurisdictions across countries including Sweden, Portugal, Switzerland, Belgium, France, and Germany. “We are the only truly pan-European litigation funder with meaningful exposure across multiple jurisdictions,” says Lercher. 

“We are the only truly pan-European litigation funder with meaningful exposure across multiple jurisdictions.”

Alexandre Lercher, Litigation Finance Fund Manager at IVO Capital Partners.

The team applies a highly selective approach to geographic exposure, avoiding jurisdictions where litigation timelines become excessively long or institutional frameworks create additional uncertainty. “Italy is a jurisdiction where we tend to be more cautious because litigation durations may be long,” explains Lercher. “And there are some jurisdictions in Eastern Europe where corruption concerns may become relevant.” Building a diversified portfolio across jurisdictions is therefore seen as an important part of risk management.

Given that litigation finance vehicles are typically structured as closed-ended funds with seven-year lifespans, managing duration risk becomes an important consideration. To mitigate both duration risk and potential capital losses, IVO Capital utilizes insurance solutions designed to protect investors if cases extend materially beyond expectations. “We use insurance to balance the two main risks: duration and loss of capital,” says Lercher. “Invested capital is covered through insurance if cases extend beyond the expected lifetime of the fund.” While legal outcomes remain uncertain, these structures are designed to reduce some of the risks associated with long and unpredictable litigation timelines.

Sourcing, Diversification, and Scaling the Strategy

With four litigation finance vehicles already launched and 12 years of experience in the asset class, sourcing new opportunities has gradually become easier. “The first step was simply becoming known among law firms,” explains Lercher. “Initially, a lot of the work involved raising awareness among lawyers about litigation funding is and how it could be used in practice.” Today, the situation has changed considerably, with the firm increasingly receiving inbound opportunities. Since the beginning of this year alone, the team has reviewed more than 80 funding opportunities while selecting only around ten percent. “We are highly selective on the cases we fund, a discipline made possible by the strong volume of opportunities in the market,” says Lercher.

“What is interesting is that each case is independent from another. There is diversification not only versus financial markets but also between industries and cases themselves.”

Alexandre Lercher, Litigation Finance Fund Manager at IVO Capital Partners.

The current litigation finance fund consists of approximately 50 separate cases, providing diversification across industries, geographies, and legal processes. “What is interesting is that each case is independent from another,” notes Lercher. “There is diversification not only versus financial markets but also between industries and cases themselves.” The team targets a success rate of approximately 60 percent while seeking returns of three to four times invested capital on successful cases. Combined, this translates into an expected internal rate of return of roughly 14 percent.

An Asset Class Still in Its Early Days

Despite increasing adoption, litigation finance remains relatively underdeveloped in Europe, which Lercher believes creates opportunities both for funders and investors. “We are seeing more and more demand from law firms,” he concludes. A major reason for this growth remains education, as many legal professionals and institutional investors are still unfamiliar with the financing model. “At the moment, litigation funding is still new in Europe,” says Lercher. “Most people simply don’t know about it. Once lawyers and general counsels discover that this tool exists, they often want to use it.” For institutional investors, understanding litigation finance increasingly means understanding not only its unique risk-return profile, but also how an uncorrelated asset class such as litigation finance can fit within broader portfolio construction.

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Eugeniu Guzun
Eugeniu Guzun
Eugeniu Guzun serves as a data analyst responsible for maintaining and gatekeeping the Nordic Hedge Index, and as a journalist covering the Nordic hedge fund industry for HedgeNordic. Eugeniu completed his Master’s degree at the Stockholm School of Economics in 2018. Write to Eugeniu Guzun at eugene@hedgenordic.com

Latest Articles

More Unknowns, More Dispersion in Private Equity

Private credit managers with exposure to software companies recently faced investor withdrawals as concerns mounted over how artificial intelligence could disrupt parts of the...

Private Equity No Longer Optional as Value Creation Moves Behind Closed Doors

As businesses stay private for longer, an increasing share of value creation now happens away from public exchanges, forcing investors to rethink where they...

A Decade of Thematic Private Equity: Summa Equity Sees Stronger Tailwinds Than Ever

While parts of the private equity industry have faced a challenging dealmaking environment in recent years, Nordic mid-market buyout manager Summa Equity has navigated...

Direct Lending Goes Through First Proper Credit Cycle 

After years of explosive growth and strong returns, private credit is facing its first meaningful stress test, particularly within direct lending, which has become...

Beyond Traditional Fixed Income: Why Aegon AM Sees Opportunity Across ABS and CLO Markets

Every day, households borrow money to buy homes, finance cars, pay for education, or fund everyday consumption. These mortgages, auto loans, consumer loans, and...

Financing the Energy Buildout: The Growing Role of Infrastructure Credit

Infrastructure has traditionally been viewed as one of the more defensive corners of private markets, characterized by essential services, stable cash flows, and hard-asset...

Nordic Hedge Fund Industry Report

Data, AI, and the Quest for Edge in Hedge Funds

When boarding a plane, most passengers instinctively glance into the cockpit. Even though modern aircraft largely operate on autopilot, the presence of a pilot...

Apoteket CIO Leans on Hedge Funds for High Sharpe

Gustav Karner, Chief Investment Officer of Apoteket’s Pension Fund since 2017, has delivered one of the highest Sharpe ratios among Sweden’s largest institutional investors,...

Tidan NOVA Profiting from Volatility Skew as Market Participants Seek Protection

Tidan Capital’s evolution into a multi-strategy platform reflects a broader effort to deliver complementary sources of alpha, with its NOVA strategy serving as a...

The New Coda: From Intuition to a Unified Investment Process

Peter Andersland is best known in the Nordic hedge fund space as the co-founder of Sector Asset Management, where he remains a shareholder. While...

When Diversification Fails: Qblue’s Case for Alternative Risk Premia

The notion that a traditional 60/40 portfolio offers meaningful diversification has long been questioned by practitioners. When implementing the Total Portfolio Approach at Danish...

Extracting Alpha from the Factor Zoo Through Systematic Investing

There are multiple ways to approach equity investing and, ultimately, the pursuit of alpha. While many strategies rely on market direction or discretionary stock...

Elo’s Slow-Moving Hedge Fund Portfolio Built Around Access

Soon after Kari Vatanen joined Finnish pension insurer Elo as Head of Asset Allocation and Alternatives, he praised the team behind the firm’s hedge...

Ress Launches Euro Feeder as Life Settlements Enter a Higher-Return Regime

In the decade leading up to 2023, Ress Life Investments generated annualized returns in excess of 6 percent in a persistently low interest rate...

Latest Articles

More Unknowns, More Dispersion in Private Equity

Private credit managers with exposure to software companies recently faced investor withdrawals as concerns mounted over how artificial intelligence could disrupt parts of the...

Private Equity No Longer Optional as Value Creation Moves Behind Closed Doors

As businesses stay private for longer, an increasing share of value creation now happens away from public exchanges, forcing investors to rethink where they...

A Decade of Thematic Private Equity: Summa Equity Sees Stronger Tailwinds Than Ever

While parts of the private equity industry have faced a challenging dealmaking environment in recent years, Nordic mid-market buyout manager Summa Equity has navigated...

Direct Lending Goes Through First Proper Credit Cycle 

After years of explosive growth and strong returns, private credit is facing its first meaningful stress test, particularly within direct lending, which has become...

Beyond Traditional Fixed Income: Why Aegon AM Sees Opportunity Across ABS and CLO Markets

Every day, households borrow money to buy homes, finance cars, pay for education, or fund everyday consumption. These mortgages, auto loans, consumer loans, and...

Financing the Energy Buildout: The Growing Role of Infrastructure Credit

Infrastructure has traditionally been viewed as one of the more defensive corners of private markets, characterized by essential services, stable cash flows, and hard-asset...
- Advertisement -