By Samantha Rosenstock, Man FRM – In the wake of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, private equity stepped in to provide financing to firms that had seen their access to the markets disrupted, leading to a period of elevated returns for the asset class. Now it is the time of private credit. With traditional bank financing retrenching from products across the credit universe, private credit is poised to continue its recent period of strong growth. In this article, we look at the increasing sophistication of private credit, the widening range of products available and why we believe investors that have previously participated in private equity should now turn their attention to private credit.
It feels like every crisis is spent comparing and contrasting the present meltdown with previous ones. So it is that we’ve spent a great deal of time recently looking back to 2008, thinking about how our experience of that period of intense volatility and existential anxiety might inform our actions now. If anything, what’s striking is how different the current crisis is from the Global Financial Crisis (‘GFC’): we’re not (over) worried about the financial system this time; it’s developing rather than developed economies that seem most at risk; and liquidity in public markets has remained strong throughout.
Crises are about opportunities as well as challenges, though. Private equity (‘PE’) firms thrived in the wake of 2008, deploying their capital into situations where public equity providers had retrenched. It is a good rule of thumb that private markets tend to perform best in the aftermath of public market volatility. Figure 1 provides a theoretical overview of the relationship between public and private markets, and between equity and credit, with an illustration of the various premia investors should demand for participation in each asset class.
Separately, private credit has undergone transformative evolution over the past decade. From a relatively niche asset class, private credit has increasingly become an integral part of many institutional investors’ asset mix. As investors cycle their portfolios out of public equities – cognizant of the historical opportunities presented by private markets in the wake of market pullbacks – we believe there is a strong case for preferring private credit over both public credit and public and private equity at this point in the cycle.
THE ROAD FROM PE TO PC
As indicated in Figure 1, the theoretical difference between private and public markets lies in the illiquidity premium – the extra return received by transacting in the private market space through additional fees and superior terms from bespoke negotiations. The problem is that private equity simply isn’t currently delivering investors the returns they require. This is down to a number of factors, from the outperformance of public equities on the one hand, to the massive dry powder waiting to be deployed by PE firms and the relative paucity of genuine growth opportunities in which to deploy it. As a recent study by Bain¹ indicated, PE has largely been delivering performance by applying greater leverage to transactions and through multiple expansion (Figure 2). This is a highly competitive, mature market in which vast sums of capital are chasing increasingly rare opportunities in our view.
The illiquidity premia paid to private equity holders simply isn’t adequate, we believe, to compensate them for the meaningful risks involved.
In contrast, the premium paid to investors in private credit relative to public credit appears highly compelling to us. In what was already a low-rate environment, central bank responses to the coronacrisis have driven public credit spreads to historical tights. The premium investors receive for investing in private credit over both public high-yield and leveraged loans is at near-record levels. This increase in the premium commanded by private credit comes at a time when the universe encompassed by the asset class has expanded rapidly.
If we look at the evolution of private credit, we can see that the first real surge in interest in the asset class came in the wake of the GFC, when banks drew back from corporate lending under regulatory pressure and non-traditional financial services firms stepped into their place. Since then, corporate direct lending has grown exponentially, with lenders demonstrating a high degree of sophistication and impressive underwriting standards. This has effectively provided a blueprint for non-traditional lenders to move into a range of other lines of credit provision, as banks not only focused on lower capital charge activities but have also streamlined lending, shedding smaller or specialised lending business lines. This means investors can access a whole host of new exposures in private credit, diversifying their portfolios away from corporates towards specialty finance. Categories available include risk transfer, consumer lending, real assets, real estate, structured finance and orphaned and special assets such as non-performing loans, receivables and equipment leasing.
Essentially, if the years following the GFC were about private credit stepping into the corporate lending market, then the more recent evolution of the market has involved private solutions to a host of specialty lending opportunities that were previously the preserve of the big banks. The lack of traditional financing sources for these categories and the favourable supply/demand dynamics within them mean that returns are often highly attractive. It should also be noted that these lending categories demonstrate a range of attractive characteristics from a risk perspective, generally experiencing stable performance even under stress; being asset heavy with strong underlying fundamentals; often structured to help mitigate downside risk but maintain the upside optionality of capital gains; producing durable cash flows to support self-amortising exits.
In summary, private credit has long been considered one of the more compelling asset classes for investors looking for diversification away from traditional public markets. In recent years, the range of exposures offered by the asset class has broadened dramatically and the current opportunity coincides with a period in which private equity is facing significant challenges. Investors should take steps to educate themselves about an asset class which is likely to feature increasingly prominently in portfolio allocations as we move through the latter stages of the crisis and into the next stage of the cycle.
¹Source: Bain & Co; Private Equity in 2019: Strong Deal Activity Despite Worsening Macro Conditions; 24 February, 2020.
About the author:
Samantha Rosenstock is Head of Investment Research responsible for executing Man FRM’s research and selection agenda and overseeing manager underwriting across portfolios. She is also responsible for manager due diligence of private credit strategies. Previously, she served as Head of Alternative Investments for the State of New Jersey pension fund and worked at AIG Asset Management.
Man FRM’s long history of researching and allocating to alternatives dates back to 1991 with our first commingled credit hedge fund launched in 1995. We currently have over $13bn in assets (July 2020) spanning the entire liquidity spectrum of alternatives supported by Man Group’s global and institutional platform. The firm has a dedicated global team focused on alternative credit strategies with experience spanning both liquid and private market investing. Approx. 90% of our clients’ assets are in customised solutions. These innovative solutions include managed accounts and expertise in legal fund structuring all supported by Man Group’s proprietary technology platform.
Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. This material is proprietary information of the Company and its affiliates and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent from the Company. The Company believes the content to be accurate. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. The Company does not assume any liability in the case of incorrectly reported or incomplete information. Unless stated otherwise all information is provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Unless stated otherwise this information is communicated by Financial Risk Management Limited and Man Investments (UK) Limited which are both authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority. Ref: 20/1653/D/GL/R/W.
Title Pic: (c) By Chan2545—shutterstock.com