- Advertisement -

Related

In Depth: Direct Lending – Is Past Performance Promising Too Much?

- Advertisement -

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – As institutional investors have been chasing yields on the back of ever decreasing interest rates in traditional fixed-income investments, private debt and direct lending strategies, in particular, have become a mainstream allocation in recent years. As with many alternative investment strategies, direct lending has spread from the US to Europe and has increasingly brought the attention of Nordic investors.

Looking at past performance of the strategy, there is little reason not to look at the asset class as a viable option to traditional fixed income exposures. Over the last ten years, according to the Cliffwater Direct Lending Index, the strategy has delivered 9,6 percent annually to a volatility of around 3.4 percent. But as always, past performance is not indicative of future returns, and the question is if the strong risk-adjusted performance can be contained.

Source: Private Debt Investor

Recent yield compression in the industry suggests that tougher times might lie ahead. Increased competition for deals in certain segments of the market has put pressure on internal rate of returns and an ever-increasing inflow of assets to the industry has also left large amounts unused leaving so-called dry powder, i.e. capital not put to work, at elevated levels.

In an effort to put direct lending strategies into a Nordic context, HedgeNordic has interviewed asset managers and allocators active in the region. We sought to find out what trends that are seen in the industry and among investors, what potential risks that lie ahead and whether the appetite for investments in the direct lending space remains.

 

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

HedgeNordic Editorial Team
HedgeNordic Editorial Team
This article was written, or published, by the HedgeNordic editorial team.

Latest Articles

Beyond 60/40: The Case for Liquid, Systematic Diversification

By Bjarne Graven Larsen: For decades during the great moderation, the 60/40 portfolio was the institutional investor's Swiss army knife. Equities grew wealth; bonds...

Aspect Capital’s Evolving Approach to Chinese Futures

Chinese futures in general add substantial diversification benefits to global futures - and the Chinese commodity futures that dominate certain Aspect Capital strategies also...

Systematic Merger Arbitrage in 2026: Why a Rules-based Approach Matters More Than Ever

By Scott Schefrin, Portfolio Manager at AB Hedge Fund Solutions: After a series of slower years for deal activity, merger arbitrage has re-emerged as a compelling strategy...

Not So Lazy Prices

By Liam Hynes, PhD – S&P Global Market Intelligence: Systematic investing has always been a story of expanding information sets. Prices, then fundamentals, then...

The Hidden Beta in LLM Recommendations

By Victor Brassart and Dan Edelstein at Hafnium: As LLMs become useful in coding, copywriting, and even mathematics, it is natural to ask whether...

Edge Hunting Across Eras

“I have always looked for an advantage or an edge in markets, and I still do,” says Peter Warren. Over more than four decades...

Allocator Interviews

In-Depth: Diversification

- Advertisement -

Voices

Request for Proposal

- Advertisement -