- Advertisement -

Related

CTA returns remain muted in first quarter, Nordic managers lag

- Advertisement -

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – The Nordic CTA industry had another lacklustre quarter in Q1 2017, lagging the SG CTA and Trend indices but outperforming an even weaker showing for the Barclay BTOP50. When the dust settled by the end of March, the NHX CTA index had lost an estimated 1,4 percent during the quarter, to be compared to a net gain of 0,1 percent for the SG CTA Index and a net loss of 0.9 percent for the SG Trend Index. The Barclay BTOP50 ended the quarter down 1.8 percent.

Overall, CTAs started the year on a weak note with trends in currencies reversing (US dollar weakened) while also commodities markets detracting from performance. February offered a more positive environment where long positions in equity indices and long base metals positions contributed. In March, CTAs once again gave back profits from the previous month. A weakening US dollar on concerns for the US administration’s ability to carry through tax reforms and infrastructure investments have been mentioned as explanation to the weak numbers.

In terms of individual winners in the Nordic CTA space, IPM had a strong period with both the systematic macro (+4%) and systematic currency programs (+2.8%) advancing. The short-term CTA program “Presto” from Estlander and Partners also stood out with a gain of 5.7 percent.

Trend following overall had a weak quarter, with the biggest loser being the Alfa Axiom Fund, posting losses of 10.1 percent. The industry giants Lynx and SEB Asset Selection also struggled.

In the multi-manager space, the programs from RPM Risk & Portfolio Management, RPM Evolving and RPM Galaxy, showed disparate returns with Evolving losing 3.6 percent while Galaxy gained 2.2 percent.

Performance numbers for the Nordic CTA industry (2016 and Q1 2017) as well as for major industry benchmarks, are summarized below.

Picture (c): Montri-Nipitvittaya-shutterstock.com

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Jonathan Furelid
Jonathan Furelid
Jonathan Furelid is editor and hedge fund analyst at HedgeNordic. Having a background allocating institutional portfolios of systematic strategies at CTA-specialist RPM Risk & Portfolio Management, Mr. Furelid’s focus areas include sytematic macro and CTAs. Jonathan can be reached at: jonathan@hedgenordic.com

Latest Articles

HSBC’s Three Decades of Building Hedge Fund Portfolios

Hedge fund investing has become increasingly institutionalized and resource-intensive, requiring access to specialized managers alongside deep due diligence, portfolio construction, risk management, and ongoing...

The Benefits of Multi-Manager Portfolios in CTA Investing

At first glance, CTA investing can appear deceptively homogeneous. Many managers trade the same liquid futures markets and rely on systematic, trendfollowing models that...

Why Some Nordic Allocators Prefer Multi-Strategy Hedge Funds

Many institutional allocators spend years building portfolios of single-strategy hedge funds across different asset classes, geographies, and investment styles. Yet there is also a...

Allocators Seek Sharpe, Not Spectacle When Opting for Multi Managers

Global allocators are once again paying closer attention to multi-strategy and multi-manager hedge fund solutions. But unlike the years before the financial crisis, the...

Swiss Family Office Seeks $5 Million Allocation to Liquid Alternatives

A Swiss family office is seeking to allocate $5 million to liquid alternative investment strategies, including hedge funds, managed futures, commodities, and funds providing...

OP’s R2 Crystal Sees Stronger Case for Hedge Funds

For much of the past decade, hedge funds struggled to compete against strong beta-driven markets fueled by ultra-low interest rates and abundant liquidity. But...

Allocator Interviews

In-Depth: Diversification

- Advertisement -

Voices

Request for Proposal

- Advertisement -