- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

AIMA calls for removal of cross-border barriers to fund marketing

- Advertisement -

The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), the global representative body for alternative asset managers, has welcomed the European Commission consultation on reducing barriers to the cross-border marketing of investment funds.

AIMA said that barriers to take-up of the so-called “passport” for investment funds has held back growth in the European economy and hurts savers and investors.

AIMA cited the imposition by many EU jurisdictions of registration and notification fees on funds, which can amount to hundreds of thousands of euros annually for individual firms, as a major obstacle to a better functioning single market for investment funds. These fee costs are often borne by the end investors. AIMA said another significant barrier has been the requirement by some jurisdictions for investment managers to appoint a local agent or representative in order to market a fund there.

AIMA’s statement comes on the day that the European Commission launches a consultation exercise into the cross-border distribution of funds. The consultation forms part of the Commission’s effort to create a “Capital Markets Union” – a deeper single market for capital in the EU. The Commission’s consultation paper acknowledges the important role that cross-border investment funds can play in economic growth by channelling scarce capital to infrastructure projects, small firms and other investment opportunities. “If funds can do business more easily cross border, they can grow and become more efficient, allocate capital efficiently across the EU, and compete within national markets to deliver better value and greater innovation for consumers,” says the EC paper.

Jack Inglis, CEO of AIMA, said: “We welcome the European Commission’s scrutiny of barriers to the use of the pan-European marketing ‘passport’, which have held back growth in the European economy. The imposition of registration and/or notification fees on funds or even sub-funds in a great number of EU jurisdictions can cost individual firms hundreds of thousands of euros annually.

“As well as reducing or removing the layer of fees, we also would ask the Commission to consider removing or minimising other administrative and  regulatory restrictions on marketing, especially in the case of funds that are marketed solely to professional investors.”

Picture: (c) aboutpixel.de–Bernd-Boscolo


Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Latest Articles

Did Energy Prices Cause This Inflation Surge?

Copenhagen – (Jesper Rangvid): You often hear that soaring energy prices, caused by supply-chain disruptions resulting from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine,...

UB Launches Forest-Focused PE Fund

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – United Bankers is launching a private equity fund investing in forest and bio-based industries. The fund, named UB Forest Industry Green...

Origo’s First Ten Years on (a) Quest

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Long/short equity fund Origo Quest is celebrating ten years of bargain hunting in the universe of Nordic small-cap stocks. After a...

The Cycle is Back and so is Active Investing

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – The relationship between equities and bonds has traditionally been inverse, making bonds a leading choice as a diversifier to an equities...

Alcur’s Third Win in a Row

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Alcur Fonder’s first hedge fund, Alcur, has been named “Hedge Fund of the Year” by Swedish business magazine Privata Affärer for...

Lynx is Fund Company of the Year, Says Privata Affärer

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Lynx Asset Management has been named “Fund Company of the Year” by Swedish business magazine Privata Affärer. The distinction comes after...


Most Popular This Week


Request for Proposal

- Advertisement -