- Advertisement -

Related

Catella Hedgefond revises fee structure

- Advertisement -

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Catella has decided to revise the fee structure for its flagship hedge fund “Catella Hedgefond“, a press release states.

Having previously applied an annual reset of its high water mark, Catella has now chosen to implement a perpetual high water mark. The revised fee structure is a response to “changing market demands” according to Catella.

Catella highlights that the current fee structure was by no means unique when the fund started in 2004 and that the fund rules that regulate the fees charged were approved by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority.

Erik Kjellgren (pictured), Catella’s head of Swedish fund management operations, however recognises that the market practice has moved towards perpetual high water marks and see no reason to stick to the previous model:

“However, since market practice has since then gradually moved towards the use of a perpetual high water mark, we find no reason to retain this principle. It is important to emphasise that the model we have applied until now has been clearly communicated, is fully in line with current regulations and entirely in accordance with the fund rules approved by the Financial Supervisory Authority.”

The revision must be similarly approved by the Financial Supervisory Authority, and can then be applied immediately, the press release states.

“We believe in our fund management model and we naturally care about full transparency, including in our fee structure,” Erik Kjellgren concludes.

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

HedgeNordic Editorial Team
HedgeNordic Editorial Team
This article was written, or published, by the HedgeNordic editorial team.

Latest Articles

Simplicity Completes Norron Deal

Three months after announcing the deal, Swedish asset manager Simplicity has completed its acquisition of Norron’s fund management business, taking over the management of...

Rethinking the 60/40 Portfolio

The 60/40 portfolio remains one of investing’s most recognizable conventions, even where few institutional portfolios literally consist of 60 percent equities and 40 percent...

Diversification That Comes From Somewhere Else

Insurance-linked investments offer something increasingly difficult to find in institutional portfolios: return drivers that are fundamentally different from those behind equities and bonds. At...

Reinforce, Don’t Replace: Carrying the 60/40 Through the Fragile Decade

By Steven Braun at Newfound Research and Return Stacked® Portfolio Solutions: Despite its ambiguous origins, the 60/40 remains the default portfolio for investors approaching...

Varma: Practical Considerations for Embracing a Total Portfolio View

Finland’s Varma is one of several large Nordic asset owners that has been moving towards a more holistic view of the portfolio – some...

Thinking Outside the 60/40 Box: How Active and Dynamic Commodities Can Complement Bonds

Bonds helped investors to diversify equity between about 2000 and 2021, which more than covers the entire career of many allocators. Since 2022 bonds...

Allocator Interviews

- Advertisement -

Voices

Request for Proposal

- Advertisement -