- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Quantitative Asset Management and Epidemiology vs. Covid-19

- Advertisement -

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – All too often in asset management, an ESG approach is geared to pleasing investors, a cheap marketing stunt or just plain green-washing. There are, of course, also those whose deep personal convictions, and indeed those of the entire firm, do strive to put their skills, powers and resources behind a cause for the greater good. One such case, led to a multidisciplinary approach leveraging insights from quantitative asset management and epidemiologyto gather and interpret large amounts of data for a better understanding of the effectiveness of measures in response to Covid-19.

In a combined effort, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and researchers from IPM Informed Portfolio Management have published a study on pandemic control by studying the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on SARS-CoV-2 in  community transmission across countries and territories.

Christian Morgenstern and James Kelly, both recently joined the Swedish quant-driven asset manager IPM from Goldman Sachs to develop the Swedish asset manager’s risk premia offering. With several other researchers, Morgenstern and Kelly studied interventions used to reduce the transmission of the novel coronavirus that has been affecting societies and economies at their core. The researchers assessed the effectiveness of these non-pharmaceutical interventions around internal containment and closure, international travel restrictions, economic measures, and health system actions on COVID-19 transmission in 130 countries and territories.

The study used panel regressions to estimate the effectiveness of 13 categories of non-pharmaceutical interventions in reducing SARS-CoV2 transmission. Data used covered the period of January to June 2020. The study finds strong evidence for an association between two interventions – school closure and internal movement restrictions, especially travel between regions and cities – and reduced reproduction numbers.

Another three interventions, namely workplace closure, income support and debt or contract relief, had strong evidence of effectiveness when ignoring their level of intensity. Public events cancellation and restrictions on gatherings, in contrast, had strong evidence of their effectiveness only when evaluating their implementation at maximum capacity. Restrictions on more than 1,000 people gathering were not effective, whereas restrictions on less than ten people gathering turned out to be effective.

Evidence supporting the effectiveness of stay-at-home requirements, public information campaigns, public transport closure, international travel controls, testing and contact tracing was inconsistent and inconclusive. “The effectiveness of school closure and internal movement restrictions appears robust across different model specifications taking into account these effects, with some evidence that other non-pharmaceutical interventions may also be effective under particular conditions,” concludes the study. “This provides empirical evidence for the potential effectiveness of many although not all the actions policy-makers are taking to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

The team presented this work at the Data Science Conference on COVID-19 (DSCC-19), organised by the National Institute of Statistical Sciences, at the end of August.

 

Titlce Pic by: (c) Blue-Planet-Studio—shutterstock.com

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Kamran Ghalitschi
Kamran Ghalitschi
Kamran has been working in the financial industry since 1994 and has specialized on client relations and marketing. Having worked with retail clients in asset management and brokerage the first ten years of his career for major European banks, he joined a CTA / Managed Futures fund with 1,5 Billion USD under management where he was responsible for sales, client relations and operations in the BeNeLux and Nordic countries. Kamran joined a multi-family office managing their own fund of hedgefunds with 400 million USD AuM in 2009. Kamran has worked and lived in Vienna, Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Stockholm. Born in 1974, Kamran today again lives in Vienna, Austria.

Latest Articles

Leveraging Opportunities in Credit Markets

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – After several years of successful bond investing through a private investment company, Nicolai Wenckheim launched an alternative investment fund in March...

ATP’s Response to Changing Equity-Bond Correlations

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – In 2022, the usual negative correlation between equities and bonds, essential for the construction of diversified portfolios, disappeared. This rare anomaly,...

Evolution in Hedge Fund Investing with LGT Collaboration

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Since Peter Ragnarsson assumed the role of Head of Alternatives at PRI Pensionsgaranti in 2015, the Swedish pension insurer has significantly...

Borea Expands Sustainability Focus with New Hire

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Norwegian fund boutique Borea Asset Management has expanded its management team with the hiring of Iselin Ahmer Solberg as a corporate...

Schroders Strengthens Nordic Client Team

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Schroders is expanding its client relationship capabilities in the Nordics with the appointment of Ludvig Löfving as a Client Director. He...

The Lynx Constellation Is Brightening Up

Stockholm (HedgeNordic) – Lynx Asset Management made headlines in late 2019 with the launch of its pure-play machine learning strategy, Constellation, as a standalone...

Allocator Interviews

Latest Articles

Man Institute Insights

Voices

Request for Proposal

- Advertisement -