- Advertisement -

Service Is Critical In Complex Environments

By Sami Kellali, MAIA Technologies: Whether you’re a new manager launching, an established multi-strat or a single family office, today’s market environment is defined by unprecedented complexity. If you’re running multi asset strategies that demand tailored process and cross asset expertise, or operating under tighter regimes like liquidity management tracking, or trading global markets, this complexity is compounded by intense regulator and investor scrutiny. We regularly hear directly from firms that rely on legacy technology, Excel-based workflows or disparate trading tools that they are no longer fit for purpose as a means to evolve, scale and optimise their business.

Investors now expect more than alpha. Their demand for optimal service levels, responsiveness and operational sophistication has heightened becoming the market standard pre-requisite for selection.

“Prospective clients increasingly come over to us due to a recognition that adequate technology alone simply isn’t enough.”

Frank Glock, Chief Revenue Officer at MAIA

Critically, hedge fund launches must navigate intense ODD which involves forensic-level analysis of the manager’s technology and operating processes. In turn, the investor’s decision is heavily weighted towards the manager’s choice of service provider and the relationships they have fostered or indeed inherited from a legacy selection process. Frank Glock, Chief Revenue Officer at MAIA explained “Prospective clients increasingly come over to us due to a recognition that adequate technology alone simply isn’t enough. They regularly voice fatigue with their incumbent provider as they need agile technology, faultless delivery and responsive support, particularly when their business is to exploit dynamic swings and volatility in the markets.”

The Problem: Just Another Client…

The root cause tends to be consistent: onboarding took far longer than promised, timelines shifted and key features didn’t arrive or were delivered as clunky workarounds; square peg, round hole comes to mind. As a by-product of the respective vendor’s relative size, many describe needing to re-explain issues to different contacts, waiting in long, ticket-based queue systems, or receiving replies that don’t necessarily cure their specific issue. Without a consistent point of contact, the smallest of issues become drawn-out exercises breeding frustration. Often times the challenge goes deeper than just service interactions. Fees that were not made clear during the procurement stage begin to add up seemingly without meaningful justification. For today’s hedge funds, with all the moving parts they must contend with, managers aren’t looking for just another vendor. They need a hands-on partner who understands their business, is responsive and acts as an extension of their own team.

White-Glove Model – Concierge-Level Service

Picture returning to your favourite hotel after a year. They greet you by name, have your preferred drink waiting and as you check in, they say, ‘We’ve reserved the mountain-facing room as we remember that was important to you.’ You’re not just another booking… you’re a valued guest. That’s what white-glove service looks like.

In the hedge fund space, that translates to continuity from a dedicated team – direct access to the people who know your profile, your workflows and your goals. At MAIA, we embody the power of this model on a regular basis. We act as the faithful extension of the client’s team, often embedding onsite when needed, using Teams channels instead of generic support portals and bringing implementation and development teams into the sales process to endorse and own the roadmap from day one.

In our client-aligned and immersive service model, consistency becomes the cornerstone. Each team across the firm are joined-up and are introduced during early discussions (not after go-live) so what’s committed is what’s delivered.

Email chains, ticketing queues and disconnected call centres might work for some vendors but they wear down the client experience. Client-centric service models challenge that: dedicated teams, techenabled responsiveness and clear accountability. The result? Issues get solved faster, trust runs deeper and outcomes are delivered within clients expectations.

Co-Creation: Building Together

True partnership means building together. When clients co-create features with their vendors, the benefits go both ways – the client gets solutions tailored to their workflow and the vendor strengthens their platform for the broader market.

We see this in action when clients test new functionality, provide feedback and shape the platform around how they work, not the other way around. Open architecture makes this easier, an open platform with strong APIs empowers managers to integrate the tools they already rely on.

Innovation happens faster when the platform is open and the support team feels more like a dedicated project partner than a help desk. Daniel Mackey, COO at Protean commented “MAIA has been great at staying close to the business and continuously building their understanding of how we work. That responsiveness and flexibility makes them feel more like part of our team than just a typical vendor.”

Relationships First is the Future

Managers aren’t just buying software, they’re choosing a partner who can scale with them. One who’s responsive when markets are volatile, collaborative when things are calm and accountable when things go wrong.

The selection is strategic. More firms are embedding service expectations into their RFPs from day one – continuity, responsiveness and technical ownership. A dedicated team who knows you. Direct access to product owners and leadership. A model where the client’s success is the vendor’s success.

The future belongs to partners who understand that.

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Guest Contributor
Guest Contributor
This article was written by a third party as a guest contribution. The content represents the views of the author(s). It was submitted and edited under HedgeNordic’s guidelines, but is not a product of HedgeNordic’s regular editorial team. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of HedgeNordic. This contribution may include paid content or promotional material.

Rethinking the 60/40 Portfolio

Diversification That Comes From Somewhere Else

Insurance-linked investments offer something increasingly difficult to find in institutional portfolios: return drivers that are fundamentally different from those behind equities and bonds. At...

Thinking Outside the 60/40 Box: How Active and Dynamic Commodities Can Complement Bonds

Bonds helped investors to diversify equity between about 2000 and 2021, which more than covers the entire career of many allocators. Since 2022 bonds...

Beyond 60/40, Part II: The Fourth Building Block

By Alexandra McGuigan, Head of APAC, Qblue Balanced: Over the past year, pension funds, sovereign investors and family offices across Asia-Pacific and Europe have...

Varma: Practical Considerations for Embracing a Total Portfolio View

Finland’s Varma is one of several large Nordic asset owners that has been moving towards a more holistic view of the portfolio – some...

Rethinking the 60/40 Portfolio

The 60/40 portfolio remains one of investing’s most recognizable conventions, even where few institutional portfolios literally consist of 60 percent equities and 40 percent...

AP3’s Jonas Thulin: “The 60/40 Portfolio Has Run Its Course”

The 60/40 portfolio was built on a simple premise: equities drive long-term returns while bonds provide stability and diversification. But that relationship is no...

60/40 – Don’t Count On It

By Harold de Boer at Transtrend: Cows produce milk. Every day again. That’s the fixed income for the dairy farmer. Bulls don’t produce milk....

Folketrygdfondet on the Enduring Case for 60/40

The traditional 60/40 portfolio, combining the complementary roles of equities and bonds, remains a central reference point in institutional portfolio construction. Few investors have...

Latest Articles

Afa Försäkring Seeks to Diversify Beyond Traditional Direct Lending

Direct lending has become a cornerstone of institutional private credit portfolios, but investors are increasingly looking to diversify beyond traditional lending to broaden their...

Operational Challenges in Asset Management: Insights From Roundtable Discussion

Running a hedge fund has never been just about managing investments. For emerging and established managers alike, building an efficient, resilient and scalable operating...

Nordic CTAs Give Back Gains After Strong Late-Summer Run

After two particularly strong months in August and September, the NHX CTA Index took a breather in October, posting a loss as setbacks in...

Fenja Capital Hires Investment Manager to Pursue European Opportunities

Danish boutique Fenja Capital, which specializes in providing tailored financing solutions to listed micro-, small- and mid-cap companies in a market-neutral setting, has strengthened...

Private Companies Outlook: Growth Beyond Buyout and Venture

By Brian Kelly at Baillie Gifford: Most private equity outlooks focus on expected returns, distributions, continuation funds, private credit and, more recently, the ‘SaaSpocalypse’1....

Gersemi Shipping Rallies on Shift Towards Short-Term Trading

After a challenging first eight months of the year, Joakim Hannisdahl’s shipping-focused long/short equity fund, Gersemi Shipping Fund, has staged a strong recovery since...