- Advertisement -

The Future of European Private credit and Purposeful Investing 

Daniel Sachs is an established figure within the Swedish investment community. For the last 20 years, Daniel has led P Capital Partners (PCP), a provider of private credit solutions to entrepreneurs and family-owned businesses. With M&G Investments recently acquiring a majority stake in this business, Daniel spoke with Simon Sharp about his business career and why he thinks the opportunities within non-sponsored private credit are only set to accelerate. 

PCP is based in Stockholm. Has that proven to be either an advantage or disadvantage?

When PCP was founded over 23 years ago, the primary focus was certainly on the Nordic market. Since then, our business has rapidly expanded across Europe with Germany now our largest market after Sweden. Whilst the quality of local talent is exceptionally high, we have always had an international team. In fact, with over 50 employees, we have 14 different nationalities. It is also worth mentioning that PCP work with ambassadors and partners across Europe. 

PCP has a particular niche targeting entrepreneurs and family-owned businesses. Is this a particular characteristic of the Nordic market?

It’s certainly not unique to the Nordics, in fact Germany, PCP’s second largest market, has an extremely large SME sector which underpins a large part of the wider German economy. There is also a lot of cultural similarity between the Nordic region, Germany and the Benelux. 

The European private credit market has grown rapidly. Do you think this is likely to continue?

Yes, it has to. Not least because of the very large competitive and productivity gap which continues to exist between Europe and the US. European companies need to substantially increase their investment in entrepreneurship, digitisation, sustainability and energy security.

Funding these investments into European competitiveness requires primary capital, the initial funds invested in a company, so demand will remain high. In terms of supply, the greatest supply of private capital is secondary capital, or buy-out capital, funding transactions from a buyer to a seller – none of that capital goes into the business to fund its development (as opposed to primary capital).

For example, private credit in Europe is 90% sponsored credit with a focus on funding buyouts¹. There is therefore a very real gap between the supply and demand for primary capital in the private credit market and this is a very real issue for Europe. Over 90% of what PCP does is use private credit to provide primary capital solutions across our strategies. PCP is by far the largest provider of non-sponsored private credit in Europe – this is a niche which remains nascent and therefore provides plenty of growth opportunities.

PCP’s ethos is ‘investing with purpose’. The focus on ESG/impact/sustainability seems to be weaking, particularly in the US. Do you think this is transitory?

From the start there has always been a dichotomy between those investors who claim they embrace integrating sustainability in their investing versus those who actually do. The pendulum does seem to be swinging, particularly in the US, against these values. However, I firmly believe that in order to build consistently profitable businesses you need to factor in the sustainability transition. ESG and sustainability do not come with a performance cost – quite the opposite, as they often help mitigate business risks and therefore enhance financial performance.

PCP is a credit provider. Why is ESG/sustainability important as there is no equity upside for PCP?

A core focus for any lender is risk i.e. the avoidance of loss. The principal has to be repaid at the end of the loan, so clearly we have an interest in ensuring the borrower is successful. Added to this is the reputation of PCP – we want to be known in the market as a firm that backs and partners with successful businesses.

M&G has recently become majority shareholders in PCP. Why did you decide now was the time to become part of a larger group?

The main catalyst was a realisation that there was a very interesting opportunity to grow our business because of the large needs of primary capital for European competitiveness. In order to do that we felt we needed greater institutional capabilities, particularly in terms of capital formation and fundraising, as well as systems and operational support. Existing PCP management remain substantial minority shareholders, which is important.

You don’t come from a financial family. What was the catalyst for you to enter the investment world? 

Both my parents were academics and encouraged discussion of politics and social issues around the dinner table. But my great grandfather – Josef Sachs – founded NK, which is Sweden’s leading department store, in 1902, so the family did have a business background. I was always very curious about business, and over time I also realised that business was a great tool to make an impact in many different ways, for example allocating capital to parts of the economy important for social development. I have never believed there is any conflict between delivering financial performance and meeting these wider desirable goals – quite the opposite.

In terms of your clients, do they tend to be one-time-only borrowers or do you maintain long-term relationships with them?

The large majority of our deals are one-time transactions, but they are not short-term relationships. Most of our loans have a duration of five to seven years. We tend to provide capital for concrete growth initiatives in a company’s development, but over time typically they will transition towards using traditional bank financing or bond markets.

¹ Private Debt Investor: ‘Regional guide: Europe’s managers optimistic despite ,macro challenges’, 30 May 2025.

The value of investments will fluctuate, which will cause prices to fall as well as rise and you may not get back the original amount you invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The views expressed in this document should not be taken as a recommendation, advice or forecast and they should not be considered as a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security.

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Guest Contributor
Guest Contributor
This article was written by a third party as a guest contribution. The content represents the views of the author(s). It was submitted and edited under HedgeNordic’s guidelines, but is not a product of HedgeNordic’s regular editorial team. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of HedgeNordic. This contribution may include paid content or promotional material.

Rethinking the 60/40 Portfolio

Thinking Outside the 60/40 Box: How Active and Dynamic Commodities Can Complement Bonds

Bonds helped investors to diversify equity between about 2000 and 2021, which more than covers the entire career of many allocators. Since 2022 bonds...

AP3’s Jonas Thulin: “The 60/40 Portfolio Has Run Its Course”

The 60/40 portfolio was built on a simple premise: equities drive long-term returns while bonds provide stability and diversification. But that relationship is no...

Folketrygdfondet on the Enduring Case for 60/40

The traditional 60/40 portfolio, combining the complementary roles of equities and bonds, remains a central reference point in institutional portfolio construction. Few investors have...

Beyond 60/40, Part II: The Fourth Building Block

By Alexandra McGuigan, Head of APAC, Qblue Balanced: Over the past year, pension funds, sovereign investors and family offices across Asia-Pacific and Europe have...

60/40 – Don’t Count On It

By Harold de Boer at Transtrend: Cows produce milk. Every day again. That’s the fixed income for the dairy farmer. Bulls don’t produce milk....

Rethinking the 60/40 Portfolio

The 60/40 portfolio remains one of investing’s most recognizable conventions, even where few institutional portfolios literally consist of 60 percent equities and 40 percent...

Diversification That Comes From Somewhere Else

Insurance-linked investments offer something increasingly difficult to find in institutional portfolios: return drivers that are fundamentally different from those behind equities and bonds. At...

Reinforce, Don’t Replace: Carrying the 60/40 Through the Fragile Decade

By Steven Braun at Newfound Research and Return Stacked® Portfolio Solutions: Despite its ambiguous origins, the 60/40 remains the default portfolio for investors approaching...

Latest Articles

Coda Looks for Cracks Beyond the AI Investment Boom

Coda Global Opportunities, an opportunistic long/short equity fund, seeks to identify winners and losers around major investment themes, or what the team calls ‘profit...

HCP Bricks Seeks to Capitalize on Finland’s Commercial Real Estate Dislocation

Finland’s commercial real estate market is offering investors an unusual combination of discounted entry prices, limited competition and access to properties that would rarely...

Nordic Investor Plans $40 Million Initial Allocation to Multi-Strategy Fund

A Nordic institutional investor is searching for a diversified multi-strategy fund, with an initial allocation of $40 million in the first year and plans...

Afa Försäkring Seeks to Diversify Beyond Traditional Direct Lending

Direct lending has become a cornerstone of institutional private credit portfolios, but investors are increasingly looking to diversify beyond traditional lending to broaden their...

Operational Challenges in Asset Management: Insights From Roundtable Discussion

Running a hedge fund has never been just about managing investments. For emerging and established managers alike, building an efficient, resilient and scalable operating...

Nordic CTAs Give Back Gains After Strong Late-Summer Run

After two particularly strong months in August and September, the NHX CTA Index took a breather in October, posting a loss as setbacks in...