- Advertisement -

From Trade Idea to Settlement: Tuning the Operational Engine to Unlock Performance Alpha

In-Depth Series:

Lifecycle of a Trade

Allocator Interviews

By Frank Glock, CRO, MAIA Technologies: Undoubtedly, performance alpha is seen as the universal standard for measuring the success of an investment firm. But what is the enabler? And – more importantly – how can a firm strive to attain the holy grail of performance? Consistency.  The answer lies in an often-neglected tenet of the investment value chain. The operational engine.        

Every trade tells a story — not just of market strategy, but of the intricate infrastructure that supports it. From pre-trade risk checks to final settlement, the lifecycle of a trade for many firms involves an increasingly complex web of technology, data flows, and service partnerships. Yet, many hedge funds underestimate the operational alpha that a streamlined trade lifecycle can deliver.

In this article, we explore the operational processes and specifically the technology that optimizes the investment value chain, and how firms can future-proof their infrastructure in a market that demands a balance of precision, uniqueness and agility.

Why Shine the Spotlight Now on the Trade Lifecycle?

In short, because it matters now more than ever. The velocity of systemic change experienced within the Alternatives industry over the past three years materially surpasses events from the preceding decade.

There is a convergence of two critical drivers that are driving this seismic shift, bringing with them associated frustrations; 1. A need for faster, easier access to richer data sets to optimise investment decision making and 2. Outdated technology platform providers unable to keep up with the rate of knots required to support the evolving needs of the investment firm.   

As a consequence, the signals in 2025 and beyond predict a ‘survival of the fittest’ scenario with firms having no choice but to make fundamental decisions today to facilitate business resilience, competitive edge and readiness for tomorrow.

The Common Challenges and How to Mitigate Them

The recurring themes that underpin the challenges – and consequently areas requiring a rethink – often faced by hedge funds remains the same: siloed systems (no cohesion between front middle and back office), manual process (increasing running cost and operational risk) and poor vendor coordination (low service levels, distracted by serving other markets alongside).

In order to deliver on a foundation for the future, COOs and CTOs should reimagine the association and relationship with technology. No longer should it be seen as a cost centre. Technology has to be a fundamental value contributor, a differentiator and enabler to scale the business and contribute to alpha. Under this construct, there is a paradigm shift that reexamines the technology vendor as to their suitability as a long-term, trusted advisor who is a positive force on their client’s business. Hedge funds should constantly ask themselves the question “Am I being listened to?” as there must be executive, operational and cultural alignment across both parties that fosters a mandate of trust. If the answer is no, then it may be time to consider change.  As Chris Driver, COO at Oldfield Partners, puts it: “MAIA is a technology partner who listens, iterates fast, and actually aligns with our long-term goals.” Daniel Mackey, COO at Protean, echoes this sentiment: “MAIA feels like an extension of our team—they adapt fast, support our growth, and continuously evolve with us.”

Like with any mission-critical partnership, there needs to be continuous validation. In this case the underlying technology and its relative integrity.  “Can my service provider cope with how my business will evolve and scale?”, “how can I gain a competitive advantage through my existing technology platform?” are often over-looked questions.

Many platforms labelled as ‘SaaS’ or ‘Cloud’ can fall-short on supporting differentiating business functions or processes that help drive alpha as they are constrained by their outdatedness and/or lack of flexibility.

Firms should place emphasis on technology partners that offer modern, modular architectures and API-first platforms that provide full programmatic control. This approach promotes interoperability and allows customisation where needed while maintaining scalability and cost containment. 

Long-term alignment is also critical. Choosing a technology partner with an adjacent strategic roadmap that is anchored to the hedge fund’s growth plans over a 3-to-5-year horizon can only benefit both parties and promote better alignment of partnership. Thomas Orbert, CIO at Truepenny Capital Management identifies with these benefits in a technology partner and says: “MAIA helped us to future-proof and streamline pre-trade to settlement—cutting noise, cost, and latency across our entire operational stack.”

Conclusion

Better, faster more agile solutions that are being borne by technology providers like MAIA drive investment intelligence and automation that optimizes the trade lifecycle and helps drive alpha.

Considering the ‘survival of the fittest’ scenario and the associated factors, it is becoming evident that firms who modernize infrastructure now will capture operational alpha tomorrow.

As agents of change, the COO and/or CTO can only enact meaningful business transformation with aligned technology partners that are listening to them. Continuously. If the answers to the big questions coming from the vendor are not compelling, it is time to change.

Subscribe to HedgeBrev, HedgeNordic’s weekly newsletter, and never miss the latest news!

Our newsletter is sent once a week, every Friday.

Guest Contributor
Guest Contributor
This article was written by a third party as a guest contribution. The content represents the views of the author(s). It was submitted and edited under HedgeNordic’s guidelines, but is not a product of HedgeNordic’s regular editorial team. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of HedgeNordic. This contribution may include paid content or promotional material.

Latest Articles

Elo’s Slow-Moving Hedge Fund Portfolio Built Around Access

Soon after Kari Vatanen joined Finnish pension insurer Elo as Head of Asset Allocation and Alternatives, he praised the team behind the firm’s hedge...

The New Coda: From Intuition to a Unified Investment Process

Peter Andersland is best known in the Nordic hedge fund space as the co-founder of Sector Asset Management, where he remains a shareholder. While...

When Diversification Fails: Qblue’s Case for Alternative Risk Premia

The notion that a traditional 60/40 portfolio offers meaningful diversification has long been questioned by practitioners. When implementing the Total Portfolio Approach at Danish...

Tidan NOVA Profiting from Volatility Skew as Market Participants Seek Protection

Tidan Capital’s evolution into a multi-strategy platform reflects a broader effort to deliver complementary sources of alpha, with its NOVA strategy serving as a...

Extracting Alpha from the Factor Zoo Through Systematic Investing

There are multiple ways to approach equity investing and, ultimately, the pursuit of alpha. While many strategies rely on market direction or discretionary stock...

Apoteket CIO Leans on Hedge Funds for High Sharpe

Gustav Karner, Chief Investment Officer of Apoteket’s Pension Fund since 2017, has delivered one of the highest Sharpe ratios among Sweden’s largest institutional investors,...